Legal Opinion

Cousins v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1923No. 11751PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, 0.

Jack Cousins, plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, sued defendants in error, as defendants. On the death of said Jack Cousins, the cause was revived in the names of plaintiffs in error, who are sons and daughters and heirs at law of said Jack Cousins. Among other things, the petition alleged that said Jack Cousins was a freedman citizen of the Creek Nation; that he received the lands in controversy as his homestead allotment and that at all times referred to, he was in the actual and exclusive possession of same as his homestead; that in 1916. being old and infirm and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Walton Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Chupco v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Clark v. FrazierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Edwards v. School Dist. No. 222, Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rollow v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Trimble v. BolesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. May v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Beall v. FergesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Blair v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API