Legal Opinion
Erik Knutson v. Sirius Xm Radio Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 10, 2014No. 12-56120PublishedCited by 247 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Erik Knutson (“Knutson”) appeals the district court’s order dismissing his putative class action and granting Defendant Sirius XM Radio Inc.’s (“Sirius XM”) motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). Knutson alleges that he did not consent to enter into a binding Customer Agreement with Sirius XM, and that the Customer Agreement as a whole, and the arbitration provision specifically, are unconscionable.
In November 20Í1, Knutson purchased a vehicle from Toyota that included a 90-day trial subscription to Sirius XM…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by247 opinions
- Norcia v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Jeff Boardman v. Pacific Seafood GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Teamsters, Local 396 v. Nasa Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Henson v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.