Legal Opinion
Norcia v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 19, 2017No. 14-16994PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Daniel Norcia filed a class action complaint against Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., (collectively, “Samsung”), alleging that Samsung made misrepresentations as to the performance of the Galaxy S4 phone. Samsung moved to compel arbitration of the dispute on the ground that an arbitration provision, which was contained in a warranty brochure included in the Galaxy S4 box, was binding on Norcia. We affirm the district court’s denial of Samsung’s motion.
I
On May 23, 2013, Norcia entered a Verizon Wireless store in San…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Mitch Oberstein v. Live Nation Ent'm't, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Tiffany Hill v. Xerox Business Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind v. Container Store, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Sean Wilson v. Huuuge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Esther Yang v. Dongwon Industries Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.