Legal Opinion
Henson v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2017No. 16-71818PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
We consider whether the defendant, a “middle man” for Internet-based advertisements, may invoke an arbitration provision contained in a contract between the plaintiffs and their wireless service provider,
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Anthony Henson and William Cintron (collectively, “Henson”) are Verizon 1 cellular and data subscribers. Henson and Verizon’s contractual relationship is governed by the “My Verizon Wireless Customer Agreement” (“Customer Agreement”), which includes an agreement to arbitrate disputes between them. Defendant Turn, Inc. (“Turn”) is a “middle man” for…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by36 opinions
- Boon Global Limited v. Usdc-CaoakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Bozic v. U.S. Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of Cal.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- AtriCure, Inc. v. Jian MengCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Kim Ngo v. Bmw of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.