Legal Opinion

Sherrard v. Werline

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the circuit court, based upon the verdict of a jury and entered in an action which was predicated upon a charge that the defendant, John Werline, the eighteen-year-old son of the other defendant, Eunice Werline, so negligently drove a car, owned by the latter, that it ran into and injured the plaintiff who at the time was crossing a public street on foot.

The defendants present seven assignments of error. The first is based upon the denial of their motion for a nonsuit; the second upon a ruling which denied their objections to a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Raymond v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Pryor's Administrator v. OtterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Vedder v. BireleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Aiken v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  5. Pinello v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moran v. GatzIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Whittaker v. ThornberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. Senkirik v. ROYCEOregon Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API