Legal Opinion
Omni U.S.A., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 30, 1987No. Court 86-2-00256PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiff, an importer of metal fasteners from Japan, challenges denial of a protest of a refusal to reliquidate. The parties cross-move for summary judgment.
FACTS
In June 1979, the Treasury Department published in the Federal Register an order covering certain industrial fasteners from Japan. 44 Fed.Reg. 31972 (June 4, 1979) (T.D. 79-158). The order required deposit of estimated countervailing duties (CVD), indicated that the net amount would be reviewed “upon receipt of information of the precise benefit received ...,” and purported to be a “Countervailing Duty Order.”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Frank E. Lipp v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Lipp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- United States v. A. N. Deringer, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Juice Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Omni U.S.A., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Penrod Drilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.