Legal Opinion
Frank E. Lipp v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 4, 1962No. 384-58PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARAMORE, Judge.
Plaintiff, a former Reserve officer of the Army, brings this action to recover retired pay which he claims is due him by reason of the arbitrary, capricious and unlawful action of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in refusing, on October 1, 1955, to correct his record of military service to show his retention on active duty until January 30, 1946, and his retirement for physical disability as of that date.
The facts are fully found and will be referred to only to the extent necessary to this opinion.
The United States makes a strong contention that plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- William B. Ogden v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Cuiffo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Girault v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Francis G. Brown v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.