Legal Opinion
Siesel v. Mandeville
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided October 14, 1947No. Docket 158/298PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The motion to strike the complainant's bill of complaint in this cause proposes for decision a somewhat interesting question. For immediate purposes, references to the details of the transaction out of which the litigation has arisen may well be omitted.
The bill discloses that on October 20th, 1945, the defendant contracted in writing to convey the designated premises to "William M. Siesel and Josephine M. Siesel, his wife," for the price of $15,000. The agreement obliged the vendees to make a down-payment, successive periodical installment payments, and at the time of the consummation of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Haughwout & Pomeroy v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
- Fleming v. Fleming Hotel Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Squire v. LearnedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Estate of RoccamonteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Seitz v. Mark-O-Lite Sign Contractors, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Segal v. Greater Valley Terminal Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Hanson v. LevyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Segal v. Greater Valley Terminal Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.