Legal Opinion

Larson v. Jo Ann Cab Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 18, 1953No. 88, Docket 22828PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. Plaintiff complains of this only, that the judge erred in that part of his charge, quoted above, concerning the burden of proof, when he spoke repeatedly of the jury’s “conviction.”

2. Courts and commentators have said that, in the ordinary civil suit, usually a judge commits reversible error if he instructs the jury that the plaintiff cannot recover unless he “convinces” them (or the like). 2 Such a charge, it is maintained, indicates something midway between a “preponderance” and “ber yond a reasonable doubt,” and should therefore be reserved for certain excep tional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Skidmore v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. West v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  5. Roth v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. James P. Ostrowski v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Josef Fischl v. David Armitage, Corrections Sergeant, and S.A. Marshall, Corrections Officer, in Their Individual CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Lucille H. Burch v. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  5. Burka v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API