Roth v. Goldman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
This injunction action serves to bring up for review the validity of five orders of the Postmaster General, entered after administrative proceedings and hearings, excluding from the mails three books published by plaintiff under various trade names. The vagaries of censorship are perhaps suggested by the fact that only one of these books was excluded as “obscene, lewd, or lascivious,” 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 334, 339 [now §§ 1461, 1342], 39 U.S.C.A. § 255, while all material concerning the others was held unmailable because of the steps taken to secure mail orders for them by fraudulently advertising…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Sunshine Book Company and Solair Union Naturisme, Inc. v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Individually and as Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Samuel RothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Grove Press, Inc. v. ChristenberryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.