Legal Opinion

Lucille H. Burch v. Reading Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 8, 1957No. 11908PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of the defendant in an action brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. to recover for injuries suffered by the plaintiff while working as a track laborer for the defendant railroad. The plaintiff asserts that the trial judge erred in certain trial rulings and instructions to the jury. All the matters complained of were fully considered by the district court in an elaborate opinion by Judge Van Dusen denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. D.C., 140…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Beckwith v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. Murphy v. WaterhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Burch v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Northwest States Utilities Co. v. AshtonWyoming Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Raymark Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  2. Greenwich Collieries v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, and Andrew OndeckoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. McSparran v. HaniganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Estate of Harris v. Dawley (In Re Dawley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Francesco Sano v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API