Legal Opinion
United States v. Morris
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 23, 1996No. 94-5240PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge:
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction entered on October 24, 1994 by the United States District Court for the South- em District of Florida, Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Judge, against the appellant Paul Morris (“Morris”) for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(4) (1988). On appeal, Morris argues that § 1029(a)(4) does not criminalize the possession and sale of altered cellular phones that access cellular services without charge. He also contests the sentence he received as improperly calculated under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. We agree with Morris that § 1029,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Hooshang HooshmandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Dennis Richard Ashe (94-5087) David Daughtrey (94-5364)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. John K. BradyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Kenneth Steven BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Clarence Earl James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Keyiona Marvete WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. TatumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. CabreraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.