Legal Opinion

Clarence Earl James v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 13, 1994No. 93-4186PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Clarence Earl James was convicted after a jury trial of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The court subsequently sentenced him to a term of twenty years pursuant to the enhancement sentencing provision of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Thereafter, he filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court denied that motion.

James subsequently filed a second § 2255 motion. In it, he contended that his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Calvin CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. James Ray ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Hooshang HooshmandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Baldemar GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. David SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. John F. Dawson v. Roger Scott, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. MikellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Joe HardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. GaskellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API