Clarence Earl James v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Clarence Earl James was convicted after a jury trial of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The court subsequently sentenced him to a term of twenty years pursuant to the enhancement sentencing provision of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Thereafter, he filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court denied that motion.
James subsequently filed a second § 2255 motion. In it, he contended that his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Calvin CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James Ray ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Hooshang HooshmandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Baldemar GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. David SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
3Cited by12 opinions
- John F. Dawson v. Roger Scott, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MikellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Joe HardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. GaskellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.