Legal Opinion
United States v. Sepulveda
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 20, 1997No. 95-4769PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, Senior District Judge:
Appellants Alice Sepulveda and Placido Mendez were convicted of possessing and conspiring to possess, with intent to defraud, fifteen or more unauthorized access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(3). Their convictions rested on evidence that they possessed fourteen “cloned” cellular telephones programmed to charge unauthorized calls to subscribers’ accounts and four unpro-grammed numerical combinations corresponding to additional accounts. Appellants contend that they are entitled to acquittal because the unprogrammed combinations are not…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Carl BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Piamba Cortes Ex Rel. Piamba Cortes v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. John Allen RootCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.