Legal Opinion
Dunham v. Stitzberg
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1948No. 5015PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Chief Justice.
The question is whether the appellant should recover damages from the appellee for the alleged breach of a covenant of warranty contained in a deed, on the asserted ground that the title to the property conveyed had partially failed.
The facts are stipulated, and those essential to a determination of the issues are in substance as follows:
George K. Angle died testate on May 8, 1932, and at that time owned certain per-serial property, not here material, and lots 33 and 34 in block 16 of the Perea Addition to the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico. By the terms of his will and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ellis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Perris v. HigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. HellardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Toland v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Massaglia v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
- Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Owen v. Burn Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Brown v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.