Legal Opinion

Martyn v. J. E. Amold & Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1895PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the -court.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, J.:

The appellees, J. E. Arnold and E. H. Taylor, as co-partners under the firm name of J. E. Arnold & Co., sued the appellant, H. F. Martyn, in assumpsit, in the Circuit Court of Orange county in the year 1891, and *448recovered judgment for $461.15, from which, the defendant below appeals.

The declaration in the cause is as follows: “And now come the plaintiffs, by Hammond & Jackson, their attorneys, and complain of the defendant of a plea of trespass on the case on promises: For that the defendant and one Charles Winegar were, on the 27th day of April, A. D. 1891, and prior thereto,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Chace v. TraffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. McKay v. LaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
  4. Bacon v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  5. Gordon v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1860

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gendzier v. BieleckiSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Boulevard Nat. Bank of Miami v. Air Metals Indus., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
  4. Spears v. West Coast Bldrs. Sup. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. State v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of Florida · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API