Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Romaine

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. Greenfield, J.

Petitioners, individually and as trustees, seek to stay arbitration demanded by respondent in connection with disputes arising out of an employment agreement, a profit-sharing trust, and a pension plan.

Respondent’s employment agreement of January 1, 1972 provided for arbitration of ‘ ‘ any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this arrangement, or the breach thereof.” Respondent’s employment was terminated by agreement on July 7, 1972. That termination agreement not only effectively brought the employment contract to an end, but contained an explicit release of the employer from…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. McNevin v. Solvay Process Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Van Pelt v. Berefco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Gearns v. Commercial Cable Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. McNevin v. . Solvay Process CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Moore v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API