Legal Opinion

Christianson v. Snohomish Health District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1997No. 64255-9PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

— The Christiansons seek review of a Court *651of Appeals decision affirming the Health District’s denial of a construction clearance for an addition to their lakeside cabin. They argue that the District’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and that their right to substantive due process has been violated. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

In August of 1990, the Christiansons purchased a cabin on the south shore of Lake Bosworth. They use the cabin for weekend recreation. The cabin is on a small lot, steeply sloped downward toward the lake from the road on the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mission Springs Inc. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Open Door Baptist Church v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API