Legal Opinion

Cortelyou v. Imperial Land Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1909No. L.A. No. 2122PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This case was originally before the district court of appeal for the second appellate district for decision, but that court being unable to concur in a judgment the cause was brought here for further consideration. Accompanying the transfer of the case here are the several opinions of the judges of the district court of appeal. One of those opinions signed by the majority of the judges of the district court of appeal is as follows:—

“Action in equity to establish the right of plaintiff as the administrator of John G. Cortelyou to 250 shares of the capital stock of the defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kellerman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Tregear v. Etiwanda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. MatthaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cortelyou v. Imperial Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. James v. P. B. Steifer Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Michaels v. Pacific Soft Water LaundryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Loring v. Lamson & Hubbard Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API