Legal Opinion

Tregear v. Etiwanda Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1888No. 12556PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the Etiwanda Water Company, a corporation, to compel said corporation, through its officers, to execute and deliver to him, in his name, a certificate for twenty shares of its capital stock now standing in the name of R. B. Warren on the books of the company.

The complaint shows that R. B. Warren was the owner of twenty shares of the capital stock of defendant, and was registered as the owner thereof on the books of defendant, and held and still holds a certificate therefor in his name, issued by defendant to him; that on the 18th of October, he executed a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bissell v. HopkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  2. Heyman v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Holbrook v. BakerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1828

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Brousseau v. JarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Hoglan v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Young v. New Pedrara Onyx Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API