James v. P. B. Steifer Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This appeal, coming up on the judgment-roll, is from a judgment duly rendered after a demurrer, both general and special to the amended complaint, had been sustained without leave further to amend. The order does not specify the ground upon which the demurrer was sustained, but merely sustains the demurrer generally.
The grounds of demurrer are (1) that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (2) that several causes of action have been improperly united; namely, a cause of action in favor of, and on behalf of, the corporation against said defendants other…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- von Arnim v. American Tube WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Schaake v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- California-Calaveras Mining Co. v. WallsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hansen v. Finn (In Re Curry & Sorensen, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- HORNSBY v. LOHMEYERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Burt v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Kadota Fig Ass'n of Producers v. Case-Swayne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.