Legal Opinion

Cortelyou v. Imperial Land Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1913No. L.A. No. 2920PublishedCited by 30 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action to establish the plaintiff’s title to two hundred and fifty shares of the capital stock of the defendant corporation, alleged to have been purchased and paid for by plaintiff’s intestate from said corporation; and to compel said corporation to issue to plaintiff a certificate for said shares, or, if it should turn out upon the trial that no shares are available which can be issued to plaintiff, then for the recovery of twenty-five thousand dollars, alleged to be the value thereof. The findings below were that the action was barred by section 337, subdivision 1; section 338,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API