Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 15, 1992No. C88-09-36545; CA A62322PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*606DE MUNIZ, J.

Defendant was convicted on two counts of theft in the first degree by receiving. ORS 164.055. He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppréss evidence found during a warrantless search of his automobile. We reverse.

Defendant was on parole when he was arrested. Among his conditions of parole was this special condition:

“Parolee is to submit person, residence, vehicle and property to search by a parole officer having reasonable grounds to believe such search will disclose evidence of parole violation.”

See OAR 255-70-001, Ex. J, Special Conditions, ¶ 1. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. GresselOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. ThreetOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. GaunceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. MEDINGERCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. SweetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. FolandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API