Legal Opinion

Richter v. Adams

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1941No. Civ. 2595PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an- appeal from an amended judgment terminating defendants’ interest in and to an oil and gas lease dated February 20, 1933, made by Lizzie H. Glide, lessor, to Edward R. Richter, lessee, and the leasehold interest therein described, the hydrocarbons produced from the leased property, and certain oil well and drilling equipment, and also giving plaintiff judgment for $27,888.32 for oil produced and sold from the leased property. We will refer to the leased land as the Glide property and to the well involved as Glide number 2. This is the second appeal in this case. Many of the facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Richter v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. RichterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. California Casualty General Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Vick v. GrasserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Daum v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API