Legal Opinion

J.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 23, 2000No. 2D97-1736PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

J.P. appeals the trial court’s adjudication of delinquency, which stems from his violation of Tampa’s juvenile curfew ordinance. See Tampa, Fla., Code § 14-26(c) (1996). We hold that Tampa’s juvenile curfew ordinance is constitutional and affirm.

In December 1996, the State charged J.P. with violating the ordinance. J.P. pleaded not guilty and thereafter moved the trial court to declare the ordinance unconstitutional. The trial court denied the motion. J.P. subsequently changed his plea to no contest, and the trial court adjudicated J.P. delinquent.

On appeal, J.P. raises…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. T.M.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. J.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. J.P. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. J.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. D.N.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API