J.P. v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review J.P. v. State, 775 So.2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following questions to be of great public importance:
WHAT LEVEL OF SCRUTINY MUST A COURT APPLY WHEN REVIEWING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE?
WHETHER THE TAMPA JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE IS CONSTITUTIONAL!;.]
Id. at 325. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution.
In T.M. v. State, 784 So.2d 442 (Fla.2001), we answered the first certified question by holding that strict scrutiny applies to juvenile curfew…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- T.M. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- J.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. J.P.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
- J.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- State v. T.M.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- State v. J.P.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
- State v. JPSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.