Legal Opinion

J.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 23, 2000No. 2D97-1551PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

J.A. appeals the trial court’s adjudications of delinquency for grand theft and for violating Tampa’s juvenile curfew ordinance. See Tampa, Fla., Code § 14-26(c) (1996). We affirm the adjudication of delinquency for grand theft without discussion. We reject J.A.’s contention that the ordinance is unconstitutional and affirm under the authority of J.P. v. State, 775 So.2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), and State v. T.M., 761 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

We again certify the following questions of great public importance:

WHAT LEVEL OF SCRUTINY MUST A COURT APPLY WHEN REVIEWING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. T.M.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. J.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J.A. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. J.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. JA v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. JA v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API