Legal Opinion

D.N.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 9, 2000No. 2D98-3858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

D.N.S. pleaded no contest to violating the City of Tampa’s juvenile curfew ordinance, reserving her right to appeal the denial of her dispositive motion to dismiss on the ground that the ordinance is unconstitutional. We affirm on the authority of our recent decisions in J.P. v. State, 775 So.2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), involving the Tampa ordinance at issue in this case, and State v. T.M., 761 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), involving a similar ordinance enacted by the City of Pinellas Park. We certify the following questions of great public importance:

AT WHAT LEVEL OF SCRUTINY MUST A COURT…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. T.M.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. J.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. D.N.S. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. D.N.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. DNS v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API