Daily Telegram Co. v. Long Beach Press Publishing Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after defendants’ demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend upon the ground that it does not state a cause of action, and that said cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations. The complaint, which is for damages based upon the alleged fraud of the defendants in procuring the execution of a contract, was filed more than three years after the accrual of the purported cause of action.
In brief, the salient facts recited by the amended complaint are in effect as follows:…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Truett v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Johnson v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Vertex Investment Co. v. SchwabacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Gross v. NeedhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.