Legal Opinion

Rachlin v. Edmison

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 2002PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudock, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the judgment 1 entered in favor of 20/20 Laser Centers, Inc. (20/20 Laser Centers) 2 and against Susan Rachlin (Ms. Rachlin) in a medical malpractice action. We affirm.

¶ 2 The pertinent facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows: In the Spring of 1995, Ms. Rachlin, a long-term contact lens wearer, was referred to Harleysville Eye Associates (Harleysville) by her regular eye doctor because she had been experiencing “redness, discomfort and itching in both eyes with contact lenses” and wanted to be evaluated for laser surgery that would eliminate her…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Yacoub v. Lehigh Valley Medical Associates, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. McClellan v. Health Maintenance OrganizationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Alumni Ass'n, Delta Zeta Zeta of Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Ferry v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Corrado v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Billig v. SkvarlaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Gramlich v. Lower Southampton TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Murphy, P. v. International Druidic SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Rivera v. Home DepotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API