Legal Opinion

Sinclair by Sinclair v. Block

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1993No. 153 E.D. Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

Appellants, Paula Sinclair, a minor, by her parents and natural guardians, Joan Sinclair and Mark Sinclair, individually and in their own right, appeal from the Order of the Superior Court affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas which denied Appellants’ post-trial motions and entered judgment in favor of Appellees, Dr. Block and Philadelphia OB-GYN Group, Ltd. Appellants present two issues for our review. The first issue is whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that the use of forceps during delivery was not a surgical or operative procedure to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Gray v. GrunnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Smith v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Brannan v. Lankenau HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Auel v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Morgan v. MacPhailSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Stalsitz v. Allentown HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Duttry v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API