Smaltz v. Newhof
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Brown, J. Assumpsit by Noah A. Smaltz against Thomas Newhof for labor, materials, etc. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The bill of particulars in this action was filed January 11, 1912, and is as follows:
November 18, to December 10, 1909. Material and labor for lathing and plastering house on boulevard, opposite John Ball Park, 680 yards at 19c per yard...................... $129 20
Paid on this account.......................... 66 70
Balance due on this account.................. $ 62 50
*502February 5, to 25, 1910. Material and labor for lathing and plastering house at corner of Shawmut avenue and boulevard, 675 yds. at 19c per yard............................. $128 25
March 3, to 20, 1910. Material and labor for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cameron Lumber Co. v. SomervilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Humphrey v. Eddy Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Baxter v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- Redwine v. Rohlff Lumber & Supply Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939