Legal Opinion

Consolidated Kansas City Smelting & Refining Co. v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the 34th Judicial District, El Paso County. Tried below before Hon. James. R. Harper.

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Associate Justice.

Appellee sued appellant to recover-the sum of $2433.60, alleged to be due him for twenty-six tons of copper ore converted to its own use by appellant. Appellant answered by general denial and pleaded that the ore was received under a custom that the value should be ascertained and that appellant should not pay for it unless it contained three percent of copper, and that less than that percentage was valueless and that the ore in question contained less than three percent and appellee had been notified of that fact but had abandoned the ore. The cause was tried by a jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sundry Goods, Wares & Merchandises v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Walls v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Xenia Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Sherwood, Thompson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Columbian Carbon Co. v. TholenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Barreda v. Milmo Nat. BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Holder v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Woodard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  5. Latta v. Transit Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API