Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hillman v. Hulett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1907No. Docket No. 33Published

Error to Macomb; Tucker, J. Assumpsit by W. S. Hillman against Bert Hulett and Allie Hulett for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Bert Hulett brings error.

1DissentBlair, J.

Plaintiff, an undertaker, of Tuscarora, Nev., brought this suit to recover a balance alleged to be due from defendants for coffin, services, etc., furnished and rendered in preparing the body of L. F. Harris, the father of defendant Allie Hulett, for shipment from Tuscarora to Armada, Macomb county, Mich., for burial. Upon the death of Mr. Harris, J. E. Douglass, noble grand of a Tuscarora Lodge of Odd Fellows, *296sent the following telegrams and received the following replies, viz.:

“Tuscarora, Nevada, November 37th. “Mrs. Alice Hulett, Armada, Mich.
“ Mr. L. H. Harris, your father, died here…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heyn v. O'HagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Bailey v. . RutjesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Turner v. McCartyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Wheeler v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Litchfield v. GarrattMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API