McDermott v. Fedex Ground Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF TREATING PHYSICIAN AT A REASONABLE COST (Docket # 134)
ALEXANDER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants, E.W. Wylie and D.W. Smith (“Defendants”), move to compel the deposition of plaintiffs treating physician, Dr. Michael Mason, at “a reasonable cost.” For the reasons detailed below, Defendants’ motion is ALLOWED as consistent with this order.
Dr. Mason is a physician who treated the plaintiff for his injuries on at least two occasions. Importantly, Dr. Mason has not been designated as an expert witness in this litigation. As such,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baker v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Mangla v. University of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Lamere v. New York State Office for the AgingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Edward S. Irons v. Jeffrey D. Karceski and Finnegan, Henderson, Farbow, Garrett & Dunner, Regents of the University of California, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Coleman v. DydulaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sanchez v. GamaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Tavárez-Guerrero v. Toledo-DávilaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Chavarria v. Brothers Fleet Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Hart v. ProgressiveVermont Superior Court · 2014