Legal Opinion

Edward S. Irons v. Jeffrey D. Karceski and Finnegan, Henderson, Farbow, Garrett & Dunner, Regents of the University of California, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 2, 1996No. 94-7231PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: 1

Appellant Edward S. Irons appeals from two decisions of Magistrate Judge Robinson pertaining to his involvement as a fact witness in a civil dispute in Indianapolis, Indiana. First, Irons challenges the magistrate judge’s ruling that a refusal to pay more than the statutory fact-witness fee of $40 per day to Irons for his deposition testimony in the civil suit would not impose an undue burden on him. Second, Irons challenges as reversible error the magistrate judge’s decision to allow counsel for two of the parties involved in the Indianapolis litigation to participate in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Northrop Corporation v. McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Patrick BaucumCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mangla v. University of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  2. Lamere v. New York State Office for the AgingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
  3. Coleman v. DydulaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
  4. Fisher v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  5. In Re County of OrangeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API