Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Gama

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 20, 2013No. 1 CA-SA 13-0072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶ 1 This special action arises from a personal injury lawsuit in which a treating physician refused to testify unless he was compensated as an expert witness. The superior court ordered Santiago Sanchez (Sanchez), the defendant below, to compensate the treating physician as an expert witness. The narrow issue we address is whether a treating physician’s testimony concerning diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis is expert testimony because it draws upon his or her skill, training, and experience as a doctor. For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction of the special…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Davoll v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Gomez-Candelaria v. Rivera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Brandt v. Medical Defense AssociatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Wreath v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Felipe v. Theme Tech Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. State of Arizona v. Bhajanpal ChopraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. State v. Hon kalauli/krollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. Schlussel v. Gerlach ex rel. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API