Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of Wrangell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1988No. S-2479PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINO WITZ, Justice.

This appeal presents the question of whether a person imprisoned for refusal to pay a fine is entitled to “good time” reductions to his sentence.

Facts and Proceedings.

Steven K. Murphy was convicted, after a jury trial, of disposing of domestic waste-water on state lands without a permit. He was sentenced to thirty days imprisonment, all of which was suspended, and fined $1,000. After proceedings which were held in conformity with AS 12.55.051(a) 1 the magistrate entered a finding that Murphy intentionally refused to pay the fine despite his ability to do so. 2 As…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Citizens Coalition for Tort Reform, Inc. v. McAlpineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Keane v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Anchorage Daily News v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Bruner v. PetersenAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API