Legal Opinion
Bruner v. Petersen
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1997No. S-7736PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Michael J. Bruner claims that the University of Alaska, Anchorage (UAA) breached its contract with him by requiring him to take a course in critical thinking before allowing him to enroll in a nursing course that he had previously failed. The superior court upheld UAA’s decision to place this condition on Bruner’s continued enrollment in the nursing program. We affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Bruner is a student at UAA, pursuing an Associate of Applied Science Degree in Nursing. During the fall 1995 semester Bruner earned a grade of “No Pass” in Nursing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. HorowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Earth Resources Co. of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. StepanoffAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- State, Department of Commerce & Economic Development, Division of Insurance v. SchnellAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Coulson v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Simpson v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.