Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Reynolds

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2000No. 98-BG-1058PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility, on the basis of findings by a Hearing Committee which the Board accepted, recommends that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for six months and be required to show fitness for reinstatement. The recommendation of discipline stems from conduct that resulted in respondent’s misdemeanor convictions in the Commonwealth of Virginia for two counts of driving while intoxicated, one count of “hit and run,” and one count of eluding a police officer. The Board concluded that respondent had violated Rule 8.4(b) of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re GilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. In Re PerrinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. In Re REYNOLDSDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re TidwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In Re DittonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. In Re ReynoldsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. In re NeebDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. In re Wayne R. RohdeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API