Legal Opinion
In Re Reynolds
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 2005No. 04-BG-452PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
On December 14, 2000, we suspended . petitioner, David D. Reynolds, from practicing law for a period of six months with the requirement that he demonstrate his fitness to resume the practice of law as a prerequisite to reinstatement. In re Reynolds, 763 A.2d 713 (D.C.2000). Before us now is petitioner’s request for reinstatement. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16(d) (2003). A hearing was conducted before a Hearing Committee which recommended to the Board on Professional Responsibility that the petition be denied. The Board in turn recommends that this court deny the petition because petitioner has not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re the Petition for Reinstatement to the Bar of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- In Re BartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re SaboDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re TurnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re JosephDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- In re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.