Legal Opinion
United Medical Management Ltd. v. Gatto
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1996No. B099882PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, Acting P. J.
Without qualifying to transact intrastate business pursuant to Corporations Code section 2105, 1 a foreign corporation enters into a contract with a California corporation to transact intrastate business. The California corporation breaches the contract. The foreign corporation thereafter qualifies to transact intrastate business and brings an action for breach of contract. The question presented is whether the foreign corporation may maintain the breach of contract action without complying with section 2203, subdivision (c), which requires the foreign corporation…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Reed v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Ward Land & Stock Co. v. MapesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Benton v. County of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- CLD Construction, Inc. v. City of San RamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Haligowski v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- United Systems of Arkansas, Inc. v. StamisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Conseco Marketing, LLC v. IFA & Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hurst v. Buczek Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.