Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Buczek Enterprises, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 2, 2012No. C-11-1379 EMCPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Docket Nos. 35, 39.
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Brad Hurst filed suit in California Superior Court on November 5, 2010, against Buczek Enterprises, alleging violations of California wage and hour laws, unfair competition, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Compl., Docket No. 1. Defendant Buczek removed to federal court on the grounds of diversity jurisdiction. Docket No. 1. Buczek…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Allenberg Cotton Co. v. PittmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Novoa v. Charter Communications, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Garnett v. ADT LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Bowerman v. Field Asset Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Ricaldai v. US Investigations Services, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Valadez v. CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.