Legal Opinion

Haligowski v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 2011No. B231310PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

INTRODUCTION

California’s Military and Veterans Code section 3941 prohibits employers from discriminating against members of the armed forces. In this case of first *986impression, we are asked to decide whether plaintiffs may hold supervisors personally liable for discrimination under section 394. We conclude that, like the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (the FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.), another employment discrimination statute which contains similar language and embodies similar goals, section 394 allows servicemen and servicewomen plaintiffs to hold their…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Janken v. GM Hughes ElectronicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Ace American Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Caltec AG v. Dept. of Pesticide RegulationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Carlos Chavez v. Schlumberger Technology CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  5. Choi v. RestainoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API