Legal Opinion

City & Borough of Sitka v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 1547

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1982No. 6116PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal raises the issue of whether the refusal of the City and Borough of Sitka (Sitka) to recognize the union selected as a bargaining agent by its electrical department employees violates Alaska’s Public Employment Relations Act (PERA) and Sitka’s Municipal Charter. The superior court ruled that Sitka failed to effectively opt out of PERA and that Sitka’s personnel policy ordinance violated its Charter. The court ordered Sitka to recognize and negotiate with the electrical department’s elected representative. We hold that Sitka validly opted out of PERA, but…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Fraternal Order of Correctional Officers v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Meiners v. Bering Strait School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. John A. Canfield v. George M. Sullivan, James D. Dunn, Ronald A. Garzini and Fred JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. State, Child Support Enforcement Division v. GammonsAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Alaska Commercial Fishing & Agriculture Bank v. O/S Alaska CoastAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API