Legal Opinion

State, Child Support Enforcement Division v. Gammons

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1989No. S-2360, S-2423, S-2579, S-2653, S-2652PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This appeal presents a question of statutory interpretation. On appeal the State of Alaska, Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED), is seeking reimbursement from noncustodial parents whose children received public assistance from Aid for Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). The issue is whether a support order which does not require the noncustodial parent to make any child support payment should be considered a “support order” under AS 47.-23.120(a) 1 , thus denying CSED any reimbursement from the noncustodial parent. The trial court concluded that AFDC was not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Johansen v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Houger v. HougerAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Matthews v. MatthewsAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Baggs v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Streb v. StrebAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Douglas v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Flanigin v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Jackson v. RappsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API