Legal Opinion
People v. Deturris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The County Court’s designation of the defendant as a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law art 6-C; People v Dong V. Dao, 9 AD3d 401, 401-402 [2004]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly assessed 15 points, under risk factor 11, for a history of drug abuse (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 15 [2006]; People v Guitard, 57 AD3d 751, 752 [2008]). The facts as contained in the presentence report, which was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MabeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. GuitardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. DaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. LawlessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. PardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. GeehrengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. SamayoaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. GeehrengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. SamayoaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012