People v. Mabee
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In establishing an offender’s appropriate risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA), the People bear the burden of proving the facts supporting the determination by “clear and convincing evidence” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]; see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]; People v Bright, 63 AD3d 1133, 1134 [2009]; People v Hegazy, 25 AD3d 675, 676 [2006]). The facts at a SORA hearing may be proved, inter alia, by “reliable hearsay” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]), including case summaries prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. BrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. HegazyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. FinizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. HewittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.