Legal Opinion
People v. Geehreng
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 19, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The County Court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly assessed 15 points under risk factor 11 (Drug or Alcohol Abuse-History of Abuse) (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 15 [2006]; People v Gulley, 99 AD3d 979 [2012]; People v Deturris, 90 AD3d 727 [2011]; People v Harris, 74 AD3d 767 [2010]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. DeturrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. GulleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. AmayaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. AshbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. AshbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.