Legal Opinion
People v. Dao
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 2004PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), dated July 18, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The County Court’s designation of the defendant as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act was *402supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law art 6-C; People v Smith, 5 AD3d 752 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 602 [2004]; People v Moore, 1 AD3d 421 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 743 [2004]; People v…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. MingoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. GoodwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. VillaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.